A Delphi survey of practitioner’s understanding of mental capacity

Clerk, George, Schaub, Jason, Hancock, David and Martin, Colin R. (2018) A Delphi survey of practitioner’s understanding of mental capacity. The Journal of Adult Protection, 20 (5/6). pp. 174-186. ISSN 1466-8203

[img]
Preview
Text
17621_Clerk_G.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present the findings of a study considering the application of the Mental Capacity Act and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Practitioners from a range of professions were recruited to provide their views of how to respond to a variety of scenarios. GPs, nurses, social workers, physio/occupational therapists and care assistants were recruited to participate. Design/methodology/approach This study used the Delphi method to elicit participant views and generate consensus of opinion. The Delphi method recommends a large sample for heterogeneous groups, and round one had 98 participants from six different professional groups. Findings Participants did not respond consistently to the scenarios, but disagreed most significantly when patient decisions conflicted with clinical advice, and when to conduct a capacity assessment. These responses suggest that clinical responses vary significantly between individuals (even within settings or professions), and that the application of Mental Capacity Act (MCA) is complicated and nuanced, requiring time for reflection to avoid paternalistic clinical interventions. Originality/value Previous studies have not used a Delphi method to consider the application of MCA/DoLS. Because of this methods focus on developing consensus, it is uniquely suited to considering this practice issue. As a result, these findings present more developed understanding of the complexity and challenges for practitioner responses to some relatively common clinical scenarios, suggesting the need for greater clarity for practitioners.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: ** From Crossref via Jisc Publications Router.
Keywords: Sociology, Political Science, Law
SWORD Depositor: JISC Router
Depositing User: JISC Router
Date Deposited: 03 Dec 2018 11:01
Last Modified: 10 Dec 2020 07:29
URI: https://bucks.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/id/eprint/17627

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item