? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 279? ? The?question?arises?as?to?why?Riesener?used?some?of?these?features.??For?example,?it?would? have?been?easier?for?him?to?use?one?single?door?that?stretched?all?the?way?across?the?front? of?the?piece.??This?would?place?the?hinges?on?one?side?of?the?cabinet/door,?and?the?locking? mechanism?on?the?other,?just?as?Chippendale?did?on?his?two?secr?taires.??While?it?is?only? speculation,?but?security?is?probably?one?reason?for?this.??A?lock?that?was?accessible?to?the? edge?of?a?piece?is?easier?to?pry?open.??The?tongue?and?groove?arrangement?prevents?the? insertion?of?a?sharp?object?between?the?two?doors?and?the?use?of?a?spring?loaded?lock?also? helped?to?reduce?the?possibility?of?manipulating?the?lock.??As?will?be?discussed?below,? security?appeared?to?be?an?important?issue?to?Riesener.? ? Security:??Without?a?doubt?Riesener,?was?more?concerned?with?security?for?his?secr?taire??? abattants?than?Chippendale?was?for?his?furniture.??As?discussed?earlier,?this?seemed?to?be?an? issue?with?French?society.158?In?England?this?appeared?less?important.159??Chippendale?for? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 158?C.?Sargentson,?Looking?at?Furniture?Inside?Out:??Strategies?of?Secrecy?and?Security?in?Eighteenth?Century? French?Furniture,?found?in?D.?Goodman?and?K.?Norberg,?(eds),?Furnishing?the?Eighteenth?Century:?What? Furniture?Can?Tell?us?about?the?European?and?American?Past,?Routledge,?London,?2007,?pp.?205?237.?It?should? also?be?pointed?out?that?Louis?XVI?and?Marie?Antoinette?were?also?thought?to?have?taken?a?keen?interest?in? ? Figure?5?58:??These?two?pictures?of?Riesener?s?secr?taire???abattant?F302?showing?the?locking?mechanism?that?is? frequently?seen?these?pieces.?On?the?left?is?the?actual?lock?showing?the?slot?for?the??D?Shaped??latch?to?slip?into,? and?on?the?right?is?the?latch.??? ? Lock???? ? ?D?Shaped??latch?? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 280? example,?used?the?same,?fairly?simple?locking?mechanism?on?nearly?all?of?his?library?tables;? this?included?the?Harewood?Library?Table,?Chippendale?s?most?elaborate?library?table.?160?By? contrast,?Riesener?applied?a?range?of?very?elaborate?locking?mechanisms?to?his?furniture.?? Some?locks?were?spring?loaded;?nearly?all?required?double?turns?to?completely?lock?them? completely,?resulting?in?bolts?that?extended?much?further?than?any?of?the?locks?on?the? Chippendale?pieces.?These?bolts?were?also?thicker?and?heavier?than?those?seen?on? Chippendale.?On?the?abattant?and?the?safe,?Riesener?s?pieces?sometimes?had?multiple?bolts? emanating?from?them???some?extending?out?of?the?top?of?the?door,?others?extending?out?of? the?sides.??Furthermore,?Riesener?s?furniture?frequently?required?multiple?keys?and?the?keys? themselves?were?more?elaborately?cut?than?on?Chippendale?s?furniture.??Most?of?Riesener?s? secr?taire???abattants?also?had?what?are?commonly?called??safes??in?the?lower?section;?these? ?safes??were?compartments?with?heavy?solid?oak?doors,?generally?tighter?seals?around?the? inside?of?the?compartment?and?made?use?of?different?keys?than?those?used?to?open?the?rest? of?the?furniture.161?? ? While?F302?used?some?of?these?features,?it?did?not?use?all?of?them.???In?fact?this?piece,? relative?to?other?pieces?made?by?Riesener?and?other?French?furniture?makers?had?a?fairly? simple?locking?mechanism;?while?there?was?a?double?bolt?in?the?top?of?the?abattant?lock,? there?were?no?side?locks?for?example???as?seen?on?F300?or?the?Waddesdon?Manor?example.?? Similarly,?while?it?had?a?safe?and?it?did?have?a?special?lock,?it?did?not?make?use?of?the?kind?of? bolts?found?on?the?F300?and?the?Waddesdon?Manor?Secr?taire???abattant.??However,? despite?its?simplicity?relative?to?other?Riesener?pieces?of?furniture,?the?F302?is?more? complicated?than?what?one?could?argue?was?the?most?advanced?example?of?English? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? complex?mechanical?devices?which?contributed?to?their?wanting?more?complex?locks.??However?the?inclusion?of? safes,?secret?compartments?as?well?as?the?complex?locking?mechanism?makes?security?appear?to?be?the?more? imporant?driver?for?these?complex?locking?systems.?? 159?This?conclusion?is?only?based?on?a?personal?observation?that?there?appeared?to?be?less?effort?by?the? cabinetmaker?to?make?the?furniture?more?secure.??While?there?was?probably?a?concern?in?England?about? security?of?documents,?money?and?other?valuables,?as?there?are?examples?of?furniture?in?England?with?hidden? compartments,?strong?locks,?etc,?it?appears?that?they?were?less?frequent?as?on?French?furniture?from?the? period.???Limiting?this?observation?to?the?furniture?made?by?Chippendale?and?Riesener?it?is?clear?that? Chippendale?was?not?as?concerned?with?security?as?was?Riesener,?suggesting?that?Chippendale?s?clients?were? less?concerned.?? 160?Chippendale,?as?seen?earlier?used?one?long?door?that?reached?all?the?way?across?the?front?of?his?secr?taire??? abattant?(See?Appendix?C,?page?469).??Another?approach?used?by?Riesener?was?to?use?a?levered?door?that?slide? out?from?a?slot?on?the?left?side?to?form?a?door?across?the?entire?Lower?Storage?Section.?? 161?Many?of?them?had?fronts?that?looked?like?drawers?for?additional?security.?? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 281? furniture???the?Harewood?Library?Table.??In?order?to?lock?the?top?drawer?of?the?F302?for? example,?Riesener?created?a?unique?solution.??On?nearly?all?other?Riesener?secr?taire??? abattants?included?in?this?research,?this?drawer?was?locked?using?the?mechanism?located?on? the?fall?front???essentially,?the?lock?on?the?fall?front?has?a?double?bolt?long?enough?to?reach? through?the?shelf?that?separates?the?two?sections?and?into?the?bottom?of?the?top?drawer.?? The?person?locking?the?secr?taire?would?turn?the?key?on?the?fall?front?once?and?that?would? lock?the?Abattant?Section.??When?they?turned?the?key?a?second?time,?they?would?lock?both? the?Abattant?Section?and?the?top?drawer?(with?one?turn?the?two?bolts?extended? approximately?1.5?cm?and?the?second?turn?extended?the?bolts?out?approximately?3.0?cm.)??? see?Figures?5?60?and?5?61.?On?the?following?page?are?examples?of?how?the?bolts?extended? out?two?different?levels?on?the?fall?front?for?F300?(Figure?5?61).??? ? In?Figure?5?62,?the?internal?view?of?the?lock?for?F300?is?shown.??This?shows?how?the?lock?was? able?to?execute?the?different?bolts?and?locking?mechanisms.??While?the?lock?for?F302?was?not? this?complicated,?it?was?similar?in?its?basic?constructions.??While?F302?had?two?bolts?that? exited?through?the?top,?the?lock?for?F300?had?a?double?barrelled?bolt,?together?with?a? spring?loaded?lock,?two?side?bolts?and?an?extension?through?the?bottom?of?the?lock.162?? While?the?bolts?extending?out?of?the?sides?were?designed?to?enhance?the?security?of?the? abattant,?the?one?from?the?bottom?was?used?to?open?up?a?secret?compartment.? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 162?In?order?to?execute?this?complicated?locking?mechanism,?Riesener?s?workshop?had?to?carve?out?the?space? for?the?lock?as?well?as?the??trenches??for?the?different?extensions?such?as?the?side?bolts?and?the?bolt?on?the? bottom?of?the?lock.?? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 282? ?Figure?5?60:??This?is?the?bottom?of?the?top?drawer,?showing?where? one?of?the?bolts?enters?to?hold?the?drawer?closed.?? ? ? ?Figure?5?59:??The?bottom?plates?for?the?locks,?the?first?(on? the?left)?is?at?the?top?of?the?Fall?Front?Section,?the?second? (on?the?right)?is?the?views?of?the?same?shelf?from?the?top.??? ? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 283? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Figure?5?61:??Two?pictures? showing?how?the?double?turn,? double?barrelled?lock?on?the? abattant?of?one?of?Riesener?s? secr?taires?work.??The?top?picture? shows?the?bolts?partially? extended?after?one?turn?of?the? key.??The?lower?picture?shows? how?they?were?fully?extended.?? Notice?also?to?the?left?of?the?two? bolts?is?the?spring?loaded?bolt.?? These?photographs?were?based? on?the?Waddesdon?Manor? secr?taire???abattant,?however?all? other?secr?taire???abattant? explored?in?this?thesis?had?similar? locks?on?the?abattant?except?for? the?one?at?Versailles.?? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 284? ? Mechanism?to?extend?double?bolt? through?the?top?of?fall?front.? Spring?loaded?latch?to?hold?door?closed? without?locking?the?secr?taire???abattant??? Extensions?to?bolt?the?fall? front?on?each?side.? Extension?to?open?the?secret? compartment.? ?Figure?5?62:??Internal?view?of?lock?for?Riesener?s?Secr?taire???abattant?F300,?showing?the?key?features.? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 285? To?open?this?secret?compartment?in?the?main?part?of?the?Fall?Front?Section?in?F300,?the?key? had?to?be?turned?a?third?time,?in?order?to?operate?this?spring?loaded?mechanism.??? ? The?safe?on?F302?was?locked?with?a?relatively?simple?lock?that?extended?two?bolts?through? the?top?of?the?door?into?the?bottom?of?the?shelf?immediately?above?it.??As?with?other?locks?it? required?two?turns?to?extend?these?bolts?their?entire?length?(See?Figure?5?61).??It?should?be? pointed?out?that?there?were?several?examples?where?the?security?of?the?lower?section?was? taken?to?even?more?extreme?that?on?F302.??For?example,?the?Waddesdon?Manor?secr?taire? had?a?similar?type?of?lock?on?the?lower?section?as?it?did?on?the?upper?fall?front?door.??In?this? example?had?the?lock?to?the?safe?had?bolts?which?exited?both?sides?of?the?door,?as?well?as? the?top.??None?of?the?Chippendale?pieces?examined?in?this?research?afforded?a?safe?of?any? kind.?? ? The?security?for?the?Chippendale?secretaire?was?not?nearly?as?elaborate,?with?three?small? locks?were?used?to?lock?its?three?different?sections.?There?were?no?secret?compartments;?no? double?bolt?locks?that?allowed?for?extra?long?extensions?on?the?bolts;?the?lower?door?did?not? have?tongue?and?groove?joints?or?a?spring?loaded?lock;?nor?was?there?a?safe.?Similarly,?the? Harewood?Library?Table?made?use?of?one?type?of?lock,?used?for?each?of?the?drawers.? However,?there?were?a?larger?number?of?locks.??There?was?one?lock?was?located?on?each?of? the?corner?drawers?and?on?the?centre?front?drawer,?then?one?on?each?door???nine?in?total.?? ? ? ? Figure?5?63:??Two?different?locks?for?the?safes?on?Riesener?secr?taire???abattant.??On?the?left?is?the?lock? for?F302;?the?one?on?the?right?is?for?the?Waddesdon?Manor?secr?taire,?which?is?exactly?the?same?for? F300.?? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 286? Despite?the?large?number,?each?used?the?same?lock?type?and?needed?only?one?key.??The?key? operated?with?a?single?turn,?turning?bolts?which?were?short?relative?to?the?locks?used?by? Riesener?on?F302.?? ? F. Materials?Used?for?these?Two?Pieces?of?Furniture? ? This?section?compares?the?materials?that?were?used?on?these?two?pieces?of?furniture? wherever?possible.??In?cases?where?further?examination?was?deemed?necessary?to?properly? identify?materials,?the?best?guess?is?offered?along?with?some?suggestions?regarding?further? testing.?? ? Wood:??Let?us?begin?by?looking?at?the?woods?that?the?two?makers?used?for?their?structural? components?and?the?carcase.???Chippendale?used?oak?and?some?type?of?a?softwood? (probably?what?was?commonly?called?deal???discussed?later??See?p.?281.)?on?the?Harewood? Library?Table.?163??Oak?was?used?for?the?inside?of?the?drawer?cavities,?the?lower?sections?of? the?file?dividers,?the?walls?of?the?pedestals,?and?the?top.?164?Deal?was?used?for?the?top?and? bottom?of?the?pedestals?and?the?top?of?the?upper?drawer?cavities.???This?use?of?materials?was? typical?of?most?of?Chippendale?s?work?with?the?notable?exception?of?the?ladies?secretaries? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 163?Quercus?robur???English?oak?or?Quercus?Sessiflora???European?oak.?According?to?notes?in?the?files?at?Temple? Newsam,?English?furniture?makers?preferred?to?use?the?European?oak?from?central?Germany?(the?so?called? ?wainscot?)?because?it?was?of?a?better?cut,?had?fewer?knots?and?more?stable?than?the?English?variety.??In?part? this,?the?paper?suggested?because?so?much?of?it?was?used?to?build?houses?and?ships.??No?Author?Given,?Temple? Newsom?Files,?Outside?of?Leeds,?UK?Accessed?between?5?February?2007?and?29?September?2009.? 164?While?Chippendale?was?a?frequent?user?of?solid?mahogany?on?his?furniture,?he?did?not?on?this?particular? piece.??Instead?on?this?piece?he?only?used?oak?on?the?doors?and?the?drawer?fronts.???This?is?different?to?what? Riesener?did?on?this?piece?(he?only?used?mahogany?on?the?drawer?fronts).??This?runs?counter?to?the?belief?by? some?that?mahogany?s?use?was?considered?to?be?much?more?limited?in?France.????A?visitor?to?England?in?1784,? Fran?ois?de?la?Rochefoucauld,?illustrates?this?point?as?he?concluded?that?England?must?be?wealthier?than? France?simply?because?of?the?amount?of?mahogany?that?was?used:? ?? ?It?is?remarkable?that?the?English?are?so?much?given?to?the?use?of?mahogany;?not?only?are?their?tables? generally?made?of?it,?but?also?their?doors,?and?seats?and?the?handrails?of?their?staircases.??Yet?it?is?just? as?dear?in?England?as?in?France.??It?is?a?matter?which?I?do?not?pretend?to?understand,?but?I?am?inclined? to?think?that?the?English?must?be?richer?than?we?are?.??? ? ?(F.?Rochefoucauld?(Translated?by?S.C.?Roberts)?,?A?Frenchman?in?England,?Cambridge?University?Press,? Cambridge,?UK,?1933?(Original?published?in?1784),?p.?30.)?This?suggests?a?few?things;?First?of?all?that?England? was?using?mahogany?more?frequently?than?France?(implying?that?it?was?more?available?and?less?expensive?in? England)?and?that?Rochefoucauld?had?high?regards?for?the?wood?and?that?in?France?mahogany?was?too? expensive?to?use?as?often.? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 287? which?currently?resides?in?Harewood?House,?where?Chippendale?used?deal?to?construct?the? sides?of?the?lower?section.165???We?also?know?that?in?the?case?of?the?Harewood?Library?Table,? that?deal?was?used?to?build?plinth?that?covered?the?casters?we?do?not?know?if?this?were?the? case?for?the?other?Library?Tables?(See?Figure?5?15).?? ? One?might?assume?that?the?oak?used?on?the?Harewood?table?desk?was?from?England,?as? there?was?an?abundance?supply?in?Britain?at?this?time.??However,?the?oak?preferred?by? London?cabinetmakers?was?a?variety?from?Europe,?referred?to?as?wainscot.166??This?variety? (Quercus?sessiflora)?came?from?Germany,?Poland?or?Prussia?via?the?Baltic?Sea167.??The?deal? was?also?probably?imported?from?Europe?and?would?have?been?one?of?a?number?of?different? conifers?such?as?Scots?pine?(Pinus?sylvestris),?Larch?(Larix?decidua),?or?Norwegian?Spruce? (sometimes?called?White?Deal???Picea?abies).??Spruce?was?generally?favoured?by? cabinetmakers,?as?it?was?paler,?softer?and?less?resinous.??Given?the?quality?of?this?piece,?the? colour?of?the?pine?and?the?lack?of?resin,?it?seems?reasonable?to?assume?that?the?conifer?used? in?the?Harewood?Library?Table?is?Norwegian?Spruce.? ? Riesener?s?only?used?oak or?ch?ne?(This?variety?is?also?probably?the?white?European?oak?that? was?used?in?England???Quercus?sessiflora)?as?his?construction.?168??Oak?was?used?for?the? framing?and?the?carcase?work?onto?which?the?outside?decoration?(veneers?and?ormolu)?was? attached?and?for?the?inside?of?drawer?cavities?and?feet???see?Appendices?D?and?E.???As? described?above,?there?were?a?few?cases?where?Riesener?used?a?harder?and?smoother?wood? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 165?On?some?pieces,?the?primary?show?wood?was?mahogany,?but?still?Chippendale?used?oak?and?a?type?of? conifer?on?the?hidden?structural?components.? 166?A.?Bowett,?Furniture?Woods?in?London?and?Provincial?Furniture:?1700?1800,?Regional?Furniture,?Vol?22,? 2008,?pp.?83?113.? 167?Lecture?by?A.?Bowett?on?The?Timber?Trade?In?London?18th?Century,?given?at?Bucks?New?University,?High? Wycombe,?Bucks,?Spring?2009,?A.?Bowett,?Furniture?Woods?in?London?and?Provincial?Furniture:?1700?1800,? Regional?Furniture,?Vol?22,?2008,?pp.?83?113.? 168?There?were?several?sources?of?information?that?were?used?in?this?effort.??Obviously?the?catalogues?of? furniture?at?The?Wallace?Collection?(F.?Watson,?Wallace?Collection?Catalogues.?Furniture?and?P.?Hughes,?The? Wallace?Collection?Catalogue?of?Furniture,?Vol?II.),?but?in?addition?there?was?Roubo?s?text?(see?A.?Roubo,?l?Art? Du?Menuisier?)??written?at?the?time?and?an?analysis?of?the?Roubo?list?of?furniture?woods.??(P.?D?tienne,?Les?Bois? Exotiques?D?crits?par?Roubo,?en?1774,?Bois?et?Forets?de?Tropiques,?No?274?(4),?2002,?pp.?89?96.).??The?primary? problem?with?using?period?literature?such?as?Roubo?s?text?is?that?they?did?not?know?how?to?identify?wood? except?by?outward?appearance?and?as?a?result?mis?identified?may?of?the?woods?that?were?listed.?It?was?very? likely?that?the?cabinetmakers?did?not?really?know?what?wood?they?were?working?with?many?times.??The?result? of?all?of?this?is?that?the?period?texts?are?unreliable.?? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 288? ??purplewood?or?amaranth???in?addition?to?the?drawer?runner.??In?the?case?of?F302,? purplewood?was?used?as?the?runners?of?the?small?drawers?inside?the?Abattant?section,?while? oak?was?used?in?the?upper?drawer.169??While?the?runners?were?of?solid?oak,?there?was?a?piece? of?purplewood?inserted?close?to?the?front?of?the?cavity?running?parallel?to?the?front?of?the? secr?taire???abattant.???Even?in?the?case?of?the?small?drawers?inside?the?Abattant?Section,? the?base?wood?behind?the?purplewood?was?oak.?? ? There?were?a?number?of?woods?used?to?finish?the?Harewood?Library?Table.??The?primary? wood?on?the?outside?was?Indian?Rosewood?(originally?red?brown?in?colour),?with?Tulipwood? borders?and?banding?(originally?pink?and?tan).?Satinwood?(yellow)?and?Holly?(white)?were? used?for?the?marquetry.??The?end?result?of?this?combination?of?timbers?was?very?colourful.?? However?it?should?be?borne?in?mind?that?much?of?the?colour?would?come?from?the?dyes?that? were?used?on?the?veneers?and?not?(strictly)?of?the?woods?themselves???these?dyes?will?be? discussed?later?(See?p.?293).??A?chart?of?the?different?woods?used?on?the?Harewood?table?and? Riesener?s?F302?can?be?seen?in?table?5?11.? ? On?F302?there?were?also?a?number?of?different?woods?employed?to?finish?the?piece.??On?the? inside?there?was?tulipwood,?boxwood,?ebony?and?purplewood.?170?Tulipwood?formed?the? drawer?faces?and?the?inside?of?the?compartments,?surrounded?ebony?and?boxwood?stringing? and?purplewood?banding.??The?result?was???like?with?the?Harewood?table???a?very?brightly? coloured?interior.??? ? The?outside?was?similarly?colourful.??The?inlaid?flowers?were?made?of?a?type?of?fruitwood? (pinkish?brown)?with?a?centre?of?barberry/berberis?(yellow).?171?This?pink?and?yellow?flower? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 169?In?F300,?also?at?The?Wallace?Collection,?the?strips?of?rosewood?were?added?to?the?drawer?itself.???It?can?be? speculated?that?the?use?of?rosewood?was?an?experiment?to?make?the?drawers?run?more?smoothly?and?for?the? surface?to?last?longer?as?rosewood?is?a?denser?and?oilier?wood?than?oak.??Because?Riesener?only?did?this?on?a? few?examples,?most?likely?this?was?an?experiment?that?his?workshop?tried?but?because?it?was?either?too? troublesome?or?too?expensive?to?continue?for?the?small?benefit,?they?decided?not?to?make?it?a?permanent? standard.?? 170?See?Appendix?G?for?more?details?and?the?French?translation?of?these?phrases.?? 171?Based?on?an?8x?magnified?analysis?of?the?wood?by?Y.?Chastang?and?his?prior?restoration?experience.??The? fruitwood?is?either?Pear,?Apple?or?white?beam?and?the?colour?is?based?on?prior?experience?at?another? workshop?when?these?flowers?were?removed?and?viewed?from?underneath.??Furthermore,?inspections?on?a? table?at?Waddesdon?also?suggests?that?these?flowers?did?not?have?a?hint?of?green?in?them?which?in?turn?is? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 289? was?surrounded?by?holly?and?the?same?ebony?and?boxwood?stringing?seen?on?the?interior.?? All?of?this?was?embedded?in?a?trellis?pattern?made?primarily?of?satine??(dark?red)?or? purplewood?(dark?purple)?and?sycamore?(light?yellow)?circles???see?Figures?5?64?and?5?65).??? ? The?ormolu?on?F302?was?set?against?a?background?of?green?stained?sycamore?and? purplewood,?edged?with?boxwood?and?ebony.???On?the?corners,?underneath?the?ormolu,?was? more?green?stained?wood;?this?time?a?burr?walnut.? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? suggesting?they?had?not?been?dyed.???Note?that?this?contradicts?what?was?published?in?The?Wallace?Collection? catalogue,?which?suggests?that?these?flowers?were?made?of?sycamore?and?dyed?green.??In?addition?to?being?a? source?that?has?been?confirmed,?the?pink?and?yellow?combination?is?more?logical?than?the?use?of?green?as?the? flower.?? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 290? ?? What?follows?is?a?chart?summarizing?the?woods?by?Chippendale?and?Riesener.??? ? Ebony?and?Boxwood?stringing?on?drawer?face? Purplewood?(banding?and?edges)? Tulipwood?(background)? ? Figure?5?64:??Inside?top?view?of?F302?showing?veneers?used.?On?the?left?is?an?overview?of?the? inside?of?the?top?section?of?F302,?on?the?right?is?a?close?up?of?a?drawer?front.?? ?Figure?5?65:??Section?of?fall?front?of?F302?showing?the?different?woods?used?in?its?decoration?? ? Ebony?(dark?stringing)? Sycamore?(Circles)? Satine??or?Purplewood?(bands)? Fruitwood?(Lily???petals)? Berberis?(Lily?centre)? Holly?(background)? Boxwood?(light?Stringing)? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 291? ? ? Table?5???11? Summary?of?Woods?Most?Likely?Used?by?Chippendale?and?Riesener172? Cabinet? Maker? /General? Use? Common? Name? Latin?Name? Probable? Source?of? Timber? Specific?Use? Chippendale? European?Oak? Quercus? sessiflora?? North?eastern? Europe?(Germany,? Poland?or?Prussia? via?the?Baltic)? For?structural?components.?Such?as?the? frames?for?drawer?cavities,?most? components?on?drawers,?etc.?Originally? light?brown?in?colour.? Structural? White?Deal?or? Norwegian? Spruce? ?Picea?abies? Norway,?Baltic? area173? Some?structural?elements?(top?of? pedestals)?Originally?it?was?whitish?in? colour.?? Indian? Rosewood?? ? Dalbergia? latifolia? Southern?India? This?was?the?most?widely?used?veneer? on?this?piece?as?it?formed?the? background?material?for?the? marquetry.??Originally?it?had?a?dark? purple?colour?with?some?dark?strips.?? Satinwood? Fagara?flava? West?India? Some?of?the?detailed?marquetry.?? Originally?it?was?a?yellowish?colour.?? Tulipwood? Dalbergia? frutescens? South?America? Much?of?the?banding?that?surrounds? the?marquetry?was?executed?in?this? timber.?Originally?pink?and?tan.? Veneers? Holly? Ilex?aquifolia? England? Extensively?used?in?the?marquetry.??It? was?dyed?a?number?of?different?colours? to?form?the?decoration.??Originally?it? was?white?in?colour.?? Riesener? Structural? Oak?or?ch?ne? Quercus? sessiflora? North?eastern? Europe?(Germany,? Poland?or?Prussia)? This?was?the?only?wood?used?in?the? construction?of?F302?this?included? making?the?drawers,?the?backs,?the? doors?and?the?frame.??Originally?it?was? light?brown?in?colour.? Decorative? ??Veneers? Sycamore?? Acer?pseudo? platanus?? Southern?and? Central?Europe? Primarily?used?for?marquetry?designs.? In?this?case,?it?was?used?for?the?small? circles?in?the?centre?of?the?intersection? of?the?bands?and?for?the?lilies?(See?the? preceding?picture???Figure?58)? Originally,?yellowish?in?colour.? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 172?Multiple?sources?were?used?to?compile?this?list?including?the?following:?L.?Hinckley,?Directory?of?the?Historic? Cabinet?Woods,?Bonanza?Books,?New?York,?1960,?H.?Zinnkann,?Furniture?Woods,?Prestel,?London,?2003,?P.? D?tienne,?2002,?Les?Bois?Exotiques?D?crits?par?Roubo?en?1774,?Bois?et?Forets?de?Tropiques,?No?274,?(4),?pp.?89? 96,?A.?Roubo,?L?Art?Du?Menuisier??b?niste,?Delatour,?Paris,?1772,?US?Forest?Service?Database?located?at? `http://www.fs.fed.us/,?Accessed?June?2009,?Temple?Newsom?file?notes,?Other?sources?included?file?notes? from?other?museums?and?museum?furniture?catalogues.? 173?According?to?C.?Boyd?(of?his?majesty's?customs?house?London),?The?British?Tariff?and?Commercial?Guide,?S.? Richard?&?Co,?London,?1819,?Wainscot?logs,?fir,?and?deal?also?came?from?East?India?as?did?Rosewood,?? ? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 292? Table?5???11? Summary?of?Woods?Most?Likely?Used?by?Chippendale?and?Riesener172? Cabinet? Maker? /General? Use? Common? Name? Latin?Name? Probable? Source?of? Timber? Specific?Use? ? ? ? ? Bloodwood?or? Satan?? Brosimum? rubescens? South?America? Used?to?produce?the?trellis?work?that? covers?the?outside?of?F302.??Originally? reddish?in?colour.? Purplewood?or? Bois?de? Amaranthe?? Peltogyne? Central?or?South? America? Used?for?the?edges?of?drawers,?the? banding?around?the?doors.??Originally? dark?purple?in?colour.??? Fruit?Wood? (Pear,?Apple? White?beam,? etc.)? Family? Rosaceae174? Europe??? Used?for?the?petals?of?the?leaves?of?the? water?lilies.??Most?likely?they?were? originally?pink?in?colour?(pear?).?? Berberis?or? Barberry?or? ?pine?vinette? Berberis? vulgaris? Europe? Used?for?the?centre?of?the?water?lilies.?? These?were?originally?yellow?in?colour.?? Holly?or?Bois?de? houx? Ilex?aquifolia? Europe? Used?as?the?background?for?the?flowers? in?the?outside?decoration.??Originally? very?white?in?colour.?? Boxwood?or? Bois?de?Buis? Buxus? sempervirens? Northern?France,? Mediterranean? basin? Used?for?stringing?around?different? decorative?treatments175?through?out? the?piece.?Originally?light?yellow?in? colour?? Ebony?or??b?ne? Diospyros? celebica? Southeast?Asia? and?Africa? Always?found?along?side?the?boxwood? stringing.?Originally?black?in?colour? Tulipwood?or? Bois?de?rose? Dalbergia? frutescens? South?America? Used?as?the?central?element?in?the? veneer?for?the?drawer?faces?and?the? inside?of?the?compartments.??Originally? pink?and?tan.? ? Walnut?or?Bois? de?noyer?(Burr)? Juglans?regia? Southern?to? Central?Europe? Dyed?green?and?placed?on?the?bevelled? corners?under?with?the?ormolu.? Originally?a?very?light?brown.?? ? As?can?be?seen,?both?England?and?France?made?use?of?imported?timbers.???England?imported? wood?from?Northern?Europe,?India,?West?Indies?and?South?America.??France?imported? timbers?from?Northern,?Central?and?Southern?Europe,?Southeast?Asia?and?South?America.??? Note?that?only?England?imported?timbers?from?India.176?In?England?both?pine?and?oak?were? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 174?Could?be?a?number?of?different?species.?? 175?These?included?bordering?the?tulipwood?on?the?drawer?faces?and?on?the?insides?of?the?different? compartments?in?both?the?upper?and?lower?sections,?around?each?of?the?marquetry?panels?on?the?front?and? sides?and?around?the?corner?decorations.?? 176?Perhaps?this?is?the?result?of?the?Seven?Year?War?when?France?lost?access?to?much?of?India?as?a?colony.??? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 293? commonly?used?for?construction,?while?in?France?only?oak?was?primarily?called?upon?for?this? function???even?though?some?forms?of?softwood177?were?readily?available?in?France.??? ? In?terms?of?both?Chippendale?and?Riesener?s?work,?as?one?might?anticipate,?only?the?best? woods?were?selected,?with?very?few?knots?apparent?and?none?in?any?important?area.?More? than?200?years?later?they?show?very?little?shrinkage?or?warping???testament?to?this?quality.?? Even?the?deal?used?by?Chippendale?had?few?knots?and?was?still?straight?after?all?of?this?time.?? ? It?is?interesting?to?note?that?many?of?the?woods?identified?on?Riesener?s?secr?taire??? abattant,?F302,?were?not?listed?in?timbers?described?in?A.?Roubo?s?L?Art?Du?Menuisier? ?b?niste,?which?suggests?that?neither?A.?Roubo?nor?most?cabinetmakers?or?timber? merchants?could?identify?exotic?woods?with?any?certainty.??Instead,?they?based?their? definitions?on?very?imprecise?descriptions???see?later?in?Appendix?I??(See?p.?643.)?for?a?listing? of?the?woods?in?A.?Roubo.?? ? Dyes:??The?chart?that?follows?shows?the?colours?used?in?the?Chippendale?Harewood?Table? and?the?Riesener?Secr?taire???Abattant?F302,?suggesting?the?formulas?that?could?(might)? have?been?used?to?produce?them.??Further?testing?is?needed?to?identify?these?dyes?with?any? greater?certainty,?however?the?formulas?given?in?the?next?table?provides?a?useful?starting? point?for?comparison.178??? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 177?These??softwoods??were?usually?referred?to?at?the?time?as?deal,?they?were?probably?either?a?type?of?pine,?fir? or?spruce.? 178?Note?testing?such?as?this?was?conducted?a?number?of?years?ago?by?a?Jack?Metcalf?however?the?findings?have? not?been?reported?at?the?time?of?this?documents?publication.??? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 294? ? Table?5???12? Colours?and?Dyes?Used?on?the?Harewood?Library?Table?and?F302? Cabinetmaker/? Colour? Item?Coloured? (Wood)? Possible?Type?of?Dye?(Key? Ingredients)? Where?Key? Ingredients? Originated? Chippendale? Red?(three? different?shades)? Holly? ? Brazilwood?and?water? ? Brazilwood,?alum?and?water?? ? Tin?Chloride,?Brazilwood,?water? ? Brazilwood,?stale?urine,?water,? pearl?ashes? ? Brazilwood,?water,?saffron,?alum? or?quick?lime? ? Dragon?s?Blood,?Ethyl?alcohol? ? Cochineal?powder,?alum?and? water? ? Sandalwood?powder,?ethyl? alcohol? ? Madder?extract,?water? ? Brazilwood???South? America? Dragon?s?Blood??? Mediterranean,?Monaco,? Socotra?(Middle?east).?? Sandalwood???India? Cochineal?powder??? Mexico,?New?Spain? Madder???Holland? Southern?Europe? India? Light?Green? Holly? Dark?Green? Holly? ? Barberry?yellow?and?Indigo? ? Liquor?made?from?green?ebony? ? Ferrous?sulphate?with?either? Cutch,?fustic,?henna?or?logwood? ? Verdigris? ? Vinegar,?Verdigris,?sap?green? ? Start?with?yellow?dyes?then?add? vitriolated?indigo? ? Alum,?Verdigris,?sal?armonac? ? Brass?or?copper?filings,?Nitric?Acid? ? Barberry,?turmeric,?water? ? Copper?nitrate? ? Metal?salts?in?aqueous?solution? ? Verdigrise,?green?vitriol,?water? Barberry???Central?and? Southern?Europe,? Northwest?Africa,?West? Asia.? Indigo???East?and?West? Indies.? Cutch???Indonesia?? India? Fustic???Southern?Europe,? Northern?China,?? West?Indies? Henna???Africa,?southern? Asia,?and?northern? Australasia?? Logwood???Mexico?and? Central?America.? Tumeric???East?Indies? ? Riesener? Green? Background?for? Ormolu?on?Top? Drawer?Section? (Sycamore)? Green? Background?for? Ormolu?along? corners?of?cabinet? (Burr?Walnut)? ? Diluting?indigo?with?vitriol?then? water?to?produce?blue,?and?then? add?berberus?vulgaris?until?the? desired?shade?is?provided.179? Barberry???Central?and? Southern?Europe,? Northwest?Africa,?West? Asia? Indigo???East?and?West? Indies.? ? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 179?A.?Roubo,?L?Art?Du?Menuisier??b?niste,?Paris,?1772,?p.?792.? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 295? ? On?the?Harewood?table,?Chippendale?(typically)?favoured?holly,?and?dyed?it?various?colours? in?order?to?produce?the?desired?design.?180?He?then?employed?sand?shading?to?enhance?the? depth.181??Chippendale?made?some?use?of?other?woods?to?introduce?contrast?but?primarily? introduced?colour?into?the?design?through?the?application?of?dyes.??Interestingly?enough,?the? F302?made?use?of?only?one?dye?(green)?but?Riesener?used?several?different?colours?of?wood? to?produce?the?desired?effect.???Based?on?this?example,?one?could?conclude?that?Chippendale? made?much?greater?use?of?dyes?to?produce?the?colours?that?he?wanted?in?the?Harewood? Library?Table,?while?Riesener?used?a?wider?range?of?veneers?to?produce?the?colours?in? F302.182??However,?it?is?not?possible?to?generalise?from?this?particular?comparison.?There?are? several?pieces?of?furniture?made?by?Riesener?(for?example)?where?are?extensively?used???the? F300?at?the?Wallace?being?a?case?in?point.???Interestingly?enough,?it?is?generally?accepted?in? the?literature?that?the?French?were?ahead?of?the?English?when?it?came?to?colour?in?textiles? and?dyestuffs,?so?to?see?an?English?cabinetmaker?such?extensive?use?of?dye?is?quite? intriguing.?183?However,?further?research?would?be?needed?before?some?judgement?could?be? made?about?the?propensity?of?these?two?cabinetmakers?to?use?dyes.?It?is?more?likely?that? this?comparison?has?thrown?up?an?anomaly.?At?any?rate?both?England?and?France?were?to? move?away?from?the?use?of?marquetry?(and?as?a?result?the?use?of?dyes)?in?the?years?to? follow.??? ? Surface?treatments:??There?is?currently?no?information?available?regarding?the?surface?finish? of?either?of?the?two?pieces?at?issue?in?this?case?history.??We?know?that?both?appear? (currently)?to?have?shellac?based?finishes?which?strongly?suggests?that?both?pieces?have? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 180?The?holly?has?virtually?no?visible?grain,?it?is?white?in?colour?and?it?is?reasonably?stable.??? 181?Based?on?observations?on?the?furniture.??? 182?This?is?despite?the?fact?that?dyes?were?well?known?in?France,?in?fact,?it?had?been?an?subject?of?very?intense? study?supported?by?the?government?for?a?number?of?years?It?was?known?that?under?Louis?XIV?the?study?of?dyes? was?very?active,?primarily?in?the?area?of?producing?dyes?for?the?textile?industry,?however?much?of?this?learning? was?thought?to?have?influenced?the?dying?of?other?materials?such?as?wood.??The?primary?focus?was?to? standardize?colours?and?to?create?colours?that?would?last?longer.?(See?S.?Lowengard,?Colour?Quality?and? Production:?Testing?Colour?in?Eighteenth?Century?France,?Journal?of?Design?History,?Vol.?14,?No.?2,?2001,?pp.? 91?103?and?S.?Lowengard,?The?Creation?of?Color?in?18th?Century,?Gutenberg,?Columbia?University?Press.? 2006?(Found?On??line?at?http://www.gutenberg?e.org/lowengard/,?Accessed?06/08))? 183?As?far?back?as?Colbert?in?the?17th?Century,?the?French?government?was?very?interested?in?research?into?dyes,? in?order?to?produce?the?best?colours?and?to?enable?them?to?last?longer?(See?See?S.?Lowengard,?Colour?Quality? and?Production:?Testing?Colour?in?Eighteenth?Century?France,?Journal?of?Design?History,?Vol.?14,?No.?2,?2001,? pp.?91?103.)? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 296? been??restored??or?refinished.184??However?there?are?clues,?which?would?suggest?some?of?the? possible?options?that?would?have?been?used?by?these?two?workshops?to?create?the?original? finish.??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? ?Gilbert?believes?Chippendale?would?have?used?a?varnish?to?protect?and?enhance?the? surfaces?of?his?furniture,?a?finish?which?Gilbert?defines?as:?? ? ?A?clear?glossy?coating?of?shellac?applied?to?the?surface?of?marquetry?to?enhance? the?colours?and?protect?the?wood?185? ? ?He?then?sets?out?to?specifically?describe?what?he?calls??white?varnish??which?he?describes?as:?? ? ?Clear?hard?spirit?varnish?used?for?coating?delicate?surfaces?such?as?japanned? chair?frames,?gilding?and?marquetry;?concocted?of?gum?sandarac,?spirits?of?wine,? white?resin?and?Venice?turpentine?.186?? ? This?is?fairly?consistent?with?the?other?sources?of?recipes?for?finishes?that?were?used?by?the? English?during?this?time.?However,?a?review?of?the?literature?on?this?identified?a?number?of? resin?based?recipes?that?used?either?alcohol?or?turpentine?as?their?solvent.???The?most? commonly?cited?resins?were?Sandarac?(as?suggested?by?C.?Gilbert)?and?Copal.?Other? frequently?cited?resins?include;?amber,?shellac,?mastic,?resin?of?turpentine?and?dammar???see? Appendix?I:?Listing?of?Formulas?for?Dyes,?Varnishes?and?Glues?used?in?the?18th?Century?for?a? listing?of?all?the?different?formulas?that?were?found.?Most?books?of?the?time?suggested?that? these?resin?based?recipes?had?the?greatest?clarity?and?provided?the?highest?degree?of? protection?and?these?two?bases?(sandarac?and?copal)?appear?to?be?the?most?common.?187?188??? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 184?All?sources?suggest?that?the?shellac?based?formulas?for?protecting?and?enhancing?furniture?was?not? popularized?in?either?England?or?France?until?the?early?19th?Century,?although?shellac?was?both?known?and?used? in?some?instances?before?that?time.?? 185?C.?Gilbert,?The?Life?and?Works?of?Thomas?Chippendale,?p.?131.? 186?C.?Gilbert,?The?Life?and?Works?of?Thomas?Chippendale,p.?132.? 187?See?for?example:?Barrow,?J.,?New?and?Universal?Dictionary?of?Arts?and?Sciences,?John?Hinton,?London,?1754.? ??????E.?Chambers,?Cyclopaedia?or?a?Universal?Dictionary?of?Arts?and?Sciences,?London,?1781.? No?Author?Given,?Genuine?Receipt?for?making?the?famous?VERNIS?MARTIN;?or?as?it?is?called?by?the?English,? MARTIN'S?COPAL?VARNISH,?No?Publisher?Given,?Paris,?1773.? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 297? It?would?seem?logical?that?the?quality?of?the?Harewood?table???indeed?of?most?of? Chippendale?s?work?that???that?the?clearest?and?hardest?varnish?would?be?used,?i.e.?a?copal? or?sandarac?formula.189?? ? While?French?literature?in?this?area?also? talked?about?resin?based?varnishes,? they?appeared?to?go?to?a?different? direction?to?protect?their?furniture???a? wax?based?finish?was?preferred.??There? are?numerous?descriptions?of?the?wax? finish?on?Riesener?s?furniture?that?were? delivered?to?the?Royal?households.190? These?are?reported?in?A.?Prad?re?for? example.191?They?are?also?to?be?found? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? R.?Dossie,?The?Handmaid?to?the?Arts,?J.?Nourse,?London,?1758.? G.?Siddons,?The?Cabinet?Maker?s?rules?and?instructions?in?the?Art?of?Varnishing,?dying,?staining,?japanning,? polishing,?lacquering?and?beautifying?Wood,?Ivory,?Tortoiseshell?&?Metal?(5th?Edition),?Sherwood,?Gilbert,? and?Piper,?London?(?),?1830.?? T.?Sheraton,?The?Cabinet?Dictionary,?W.?Smith,?King?Street,?Seven?Dials,?London,?UK,?1803.? Tingry,?P.,?A?Painters?and?Varnisher's?Guide,?G.?Kearsley,?London,?1804.? P.?Weber,?The?Cabinet?Maker?s?Guide,?John?Arliss,?London,?1809.? 188?Oil?finishes?were?also?mentioned?in?many?of?these?books,?among?them?were?poppy?seed?oil,?walnut?oil,?and? the?most?often?mentioned?as?the?most?prevalent?oil?based?finish?was?linseed?oil.??It?is?interesting?to?note?that? while?poppy?seed?and?walnut?oils?were?preferred?because?they?were?more?durable?and?they?were?lighter?in? colour?and?therefore?showed?more?detail?in?the?wood,?linseed?oil?was?the?easiest?to?work?with?and?one?of?the? least?expensive?oils.??? 189?While?it?was?written?in?the?18th?Century?that?Copal?and?Sandarac?were?clearest?and?hardest?of?the?resin? finishes,?more?recent?research?has?demonstrated?that?both?are?clear?to?start?(Sandarac?was?the?clearest)?but? that?while?all?ingredients?colour?with?age,?Copal?becomes?relatively?less?clear?as?it?ages,?relative?to?most?other? resin?finishes.??It?should?be?pointed?out?that?testing?such?as?this?is?very?difficult?as?there?are?a?number?of? different?sources?for?Copal,?Sandarac?and?other?resins?and?this?could?affect?the?quality?of?the?final?product.?? Even?authors?of?that?time?mentioned?this?and?instructed?the?readers?on?how?to?select?the?best?ingredients.?? See?R.?Heesters,?H.?Keulen?and?W.?Roelofs,?Natural?resins,?Artificially?aged?in?Steps,?Contributions?to? Conservation,?(J.?Mosk?and?N.?Tennent,?eds),?James?and?James,?London,?2002,?pp.?55???63.? 190?Various?Authors,?Journal?du?Garde?Meuble,?1761?1784,?These?are?detailed?listings?of?all?furniture?that?was? either?delivered,?ordered?or?repaired?in?service?for?France's?Royal?Households.??Copies?are?located?in?The? Wallace?Collection?Library?and?are?available?in?France's?archives.? 191?A.?Pradere,?(Translated?by?P.?Wood),?French?Furniture?Makers,?The?Art?of?the?Ebeniste?from?Louis?XIV?to?the? Revolution,?pp.?374,?379.? ? Figure?5?66:?Picture?of?a?French?cabinetmaker?applying? wax?to?the?surface?of?a?veneered?section?of?a?cabinet?or? table.?? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 298? in?L?art?du?peinture,?doreur,?vernisseur.192??A.?Roubo?also?discusses?finishes?but?wax?was?the? one?that?he?describes?at?length.193??While?modern?versions?of?wax?contain?mixtures?of? different?waxes?and?turpentine?(to?soften?it),?A.?Roubo?recommends?pure?beesway? (bleached,?filtered?and?melted)?applied?with?a?stiff?brush?made?of?bound?reeds.?? ? Glues:?? In?England,?historic?texts?discussing?furniture?refer?to?what?was?called?a??strong??glue,?while? the?leading?three?French?texts?all?refer?to?the?use?of??English?glue?.194??In?both?cases,?these? relate?to?a?hide?or?skin?glue?rendered?from?the?skin?of?cattle?or?sheep?and?(apparently)?older? cattle?produce?the?best?glue:??? ? The?makers?of?Strong?glue?usually?employ?more?common?substances,?such?as?leather? clippings?of?oxen,?calves,?sheep,?horses,?etc.??.??&?the?older?and?thinner?these?animals? are,?the?stronger?the?glue?is.195? ? The?process?for?making?a?basic??strong??or??English??glue?was?to?first?soak?skins?in?water??? sometimes?lime?water.??The?skins?are?repeatedly?rinsed?until?the?water?is?clear?which?serves? to?remove?dirt?and?impurities?and?to?dissolve?the?fleshier?and?bloodier?parts.??Sometimes?a? solution?of?alum?and?tallow?was?added?to?the?water.??The?next?step?is?to?put?clippings?of? rinsed?hide?in?water?that?is?to?be?boiled?in?a?copper?pot?for?12?to?15?hours,?skimming?off?the? scum?that?forms?on?the?surface.??One?needs?to?keep?the?solution?warm?and?remove?the? impurities?which?accumulate?on?the?bottom?of?the?pot.??Once?sufficiently?pure,?the?solution? is?poured?into?wooded?moulds?through?hair?sieves?to?filter?off?any?remaining?impurities?and? then?left?to?dry.???Once?dried,?the?glue?can?be?reheated?and?applied?when?needed.??? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 192?According?to?Godla?(See?J.?Godla,?The?Use?of?Wax?Finishes?on?Pre??Industrial?American?Furniture,?1991?WAG? Postscripts,?Albuquerque,?NM,?USA,?(No?Page?number?was?given,?article?was?located?on?the?web?page? http://cool.conservation?us.org/coolaic/sg/wag/1991/WAG_91_godla.pdf))?The?1755?edition?of?J.?Watins,?L?art? du?peinture,?doreur,?vernisseur?the?varnishing?section?starts?with?a?statement?that?the?preferred?method?of? coating?a?piece?of?furniture,?by?the??mid?century?Parisian?furniture?shops??was?to?use?wax?and?not?varnish.?This? was?not?included?in?the?1776?edition?of?this?same?text.?? 193?See?A.?Roubo,?l?Art?Du?Menuisier?,?Leonce?Laget,?Paris,?1977?(reprint?from?original?1765?1775)?pp.?857???865.?? 194?See?for?example:??D.?Monceau,(translated?by?A.?Higgenbotham?in?2005)?L'art?de?faire?diff?rentes?sortes?de? colles?(The?Art?of?Making?Various?Kinds?of?Glues),?The?Royal?Academy?of?Sciences,?Paris,?1771,?p.?2.??However,? this?is?also?true?in?Roubo?s?l?Art?Du?Menuisier?(See?A.?Roubo??l?Art?Du?Menuisier).? 195?D.?Monceau?(translated?by?A.?Higgenbotham?in?2005)?The?Art?of?Making?Various?Kinds?of?Glues,?p.?4.? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 299? ? It?is?interesting?to?note?that?English?texts?often?give?formulas?for?adulterating?the?glues???the? French?texts?(at?least?those?reviewed?by?this?author)?made?no?mention?of?these?variations.? 196??These?adulterations?included?things?to?make?the?glue?moisture?resistant?or?make?the? glue?work?better?with?metals?or?glass???see?Appendix?B?for?a?listing?of?these?formulas.?? However,?French?texts?do?mention?various?glue?types?such?as;? ? o Calves?Feet?Glue?(Flanders?Glue),?which?was?more?transparent?than??strong??glue??? but?weaker.??Good?for?paper.?? o Glove?glue?or?Parchment?Glue???made?from?white?glove?skin.??Again?weaker?but?less? inexpensive.??Good?for?Tempera?paints,?gilding,?and?clothing.? o Fish?glue???made?from?the?fins,?nervous?and?mucilaginous?parts?of?fish.??However?the? best?is?made?from?the?bladder?of?the?sturgeon.?? o Flour?glue???usually?made?from?whole?wheat?flour?generally?but?also?from?rye,?black? wheat?or?buckwheat?flour.??Good?for?paper?and?cloth.?? ???? Metals:??There?were?a?number?of?metals?that?were?used?on?the?two?pieces?of?furniture?at? issue?in?this?case?study.??As?described?above,?both?the?Chippendale?and?the?Riesener?pieces? were?decorated?with?a?significant?amount?of?ormolu.??To?hold?these?in?place,?Riesener? attached?steel?screws?and?bolts?to?the?backs?of?the?ormolu.??Chippendale?used?brass?pins? and?screws,?inserted?through?the?front?of?the?gilded?metal.?197??Both?makers?used?locks?that? were?made?of?steel?and?brass,?which?used?steel?for?the?screws?to?hold?them?in?place.?? Chippendale?used?screws?to?hold?the?top?in?place?and?fix?locks?in?place?and?he?used?small? pins?to?hold?the?lower?drawer?runners?in?place.??On?the?Riesener?piece,?hinges?were?made?of? brass?with?brass?screws.??Chippendale,?as?noted?earlier,?used?a?steel?support?that?was? attached?with?steel?screws.??To?hold?ormolu?in?place?on?the?Harewood?table,?Chippendale? used?small?brass?nails?and?screws?while?on?Riesener?s?F302,?most?of?the?ormolu?was? attached?with?a?steel?rod?that?was?attached?to?the?back?of?the?ormolu?and?inserted?through? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 196?This?was?to?produce?glue?for?different?materials?(glass,?marble,?leather)?or?situations?(when?the? environment?is?to?get?wet,?or?when?a?flexible?glue?is?needed.??These?are?detailed?in?Appendix?B?or?see?T.? Sheraton,?The?Cabinet?Dictionary?or?E.?Chambers,?Cyclopaedia?or?An?Universal?Dictionary?of?Arts?and?Sciences.? 197?There?were?occasions?where?steel?appeared?to?have?been?used,?but?it?is?unclear?if?these?were?original?or? replacements?that?were?added?at?a?later?time.?? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 300? the?wood?then?a?nut?was?attached?from?the?inside.??There?was?an?escutcheon?located?on?the? door?of?F302,?which?is?missing?at?this?time.???It?is?assumed?that?this?too?was?of?gold?ormolu.?? The?keyhole?on?the?face?of?the?abattant?is?discreetly?incorporated?into?the?design?of?the? plaque?which?surrounds?it,?hidden?in?the?ribbon.? ? It?should?be?noted?that?while?the?general?perception?and?the?usual?description?of?ormolu? mounts?from?this?period?is?that?it?is?mercury?gilded?bronze?(Copper?plus?tin).??However? testing?has?been?accomplished?on?two?of?the?secr?taire???abattants?by?Riesener?that?were? discussed?in?this?thesis?as?well?as?several?other?French?pieces?that?were?made?during?this? period.??The?table?(Table?5?13),?which?follows?later?in?this?chapter?(see?p.?307)?details?these? findings.?? ? Marble:???The?top?of?F302?is?a?white?veined?marble?slab?that?has?been?cut?in?the?shape?of?the? top?of?the?secr?taire?with?canted?corners?and?a?flat?front?and?sides?and?is?surmounted?by?an? ormolu?gallery.??The?edges?of?the?cut?of?the?sides?are?flat?with?no?profile.??Ormolu?top?railing? that?was?discussed?earlier?(See?p.?255).??While?no?petrographic?analysis?was?conducted?on? this?marble,?in?most?texts?this?is?identified?as?a?Carrara?marble?from?Italy.198??Chippendale?s? library?tables?made?no?use?of?marble.?? ? Leather:???The?leather?used?on?the?fall?front?of?F302?is?known?to?have?been?replaced?since?it? was?originally?made.??Currently?the?leather?in?place?is?cow?leather?that?has?been?dyed?red.?? Most?secr?taire???abattant?provided?to?the?Royal?family?by?Riesener?had?black?Moroccan? skivers?thought?to?have?been?made?from?goatskins.?Sometimes?a?gold?border?was?embossed? around?the?edge,?sometimes?silver.??The?Harewood?table?has?a?leather?skiver?to?cover?its? expansive?top?and?while?the?leather?has?been?replaced,?the?embossed?border?is?thought?to? match?the?original,?although?there?is?no?evidence?to?confirm?that?this?is?correct.?? ? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 198?This?marble?is?reported?to?come?from?the?province?of?Massa?Carrara?near?Tuscany.??? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 301? ? G. Special?Topics? ? In?addition?to?the?basic?structural?approaches?described?above,?there?are?several?smaller? issues?of?note.???This?section?begins?the?process?of?identifying?these?details?and?analysing? them.?? ? Attaching?Ormolu?to?the?Piece?of?Furniture:??It?has?been?claimed?that?the?advantage?that? Riesener?had?in?working?directly?for?the?crown,?lay?in?the?access?to?the?range?of?artisan?skills? it?provided.??The?fact?that?Riesener?was?familiar?with?both?the?production?of?ormolu?and?the? problems?associated?with?attaching?it?to?furniture,?led?(for?example)?to?him?seeking?a? solution?to?the?problem?of?attaching?them?in?a?less?obvious?way.??Other?cabinetmakers? usually?secured?ormolu?by?simply?placing?a?screw?through?the?face?of?the?ormolu?(while? trying?to?hide?its?presence?as?much?as?possible)?into?the?wood.??Riesener?developed?a? technique?which?kept?the?screw?hidden?from?view,?perhaps?based?on?a?technique?developed? originally?by?Andre?Charles?Boulle.??Riesener?s?technique?was?to?cast?or?braise?post?with?a? threaded?hole?(to?take?a?screw)?to?the?back?of?the?piece? of?ormolu.?By?inserting?the?post?through?the?wood?and? using?a?screw?to?secure?the?ormolu,?fixing?was? rendered?invisible?from?the?front.?In?the?few?cases? where?these?bolts?would?have?interfered?with?the? appearance?of?the?inside?of?the?piece?of?furniture,? Riesener?covered?the?fixture?with?a?piece?of?veneer?to? match?the?surround.??A?series?of?photographs?that? demonstrate?how?Riesener?performed?this?trick?can?be? seen?below.?199?? ? It?is?interesting?to?note?that?there?are?examples?when?Riesener?uses?conventional?methods? of?fixture????the?thuya?veneered?secr?taire???abattant?at?The?Wallace?Collection?for?example.?? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 199??F.?Watson,?Puzzles?and?Problems?in?French?Furniture?Mounts,?Apollo,?Vol?XCV,?no?121,?1972,?pp.?196?200.?? ? Figure?5?67:??The?gallery?for?The? Trellised?secr?taire???abattant? located?in?The?Wallace?Collection? (F302).??Note:??the?screws?being? used?to?hold?the?gallery?to?the?top? of?the?furniture.?? ? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 302? Figure?5?68:??How?Riesener?attached?ormolu?to?a?Secr?taire???abattant.??The?picture?on?the?far?left? shows?three?different?variations?what?allow?the?ormolu?to?be?attached?without?a?screw?being?visible? from?the?back.??The?middle?picture?shows?how?the?bolt?and?screw?was?normally?seen?on?the?inside?of? the?piece.?Note?that?none?of?these?were?visible?from?the?inside?of?the?piece?as?this?was?covered?with?a? unit?containing?drawers?and?pigeonholes.??In?some?cases,?veneer?covered?the?screws?and?bolt.???When?a? repair?was?needed,?the?veneer?had?to?be?removed?and?a?patch?placed?over?the?screw/bolt.??The?far?right? picture?shows?how?a?replacement?patch?of?matching?veneer?covered?the?bolt?and?screw.??? On?the?F302,?the?gallery?at?the?top?of?the?piece?also?uses?screws?to?hold?it?in?place???and? while?it?is?possible?these?have?been?added?later,?any?firm?conclusion?concerning?this?debate,? could?only?be?resolved?by?removing?the?gallery?to?ascertain?whether?this?ormolu?was?ever? attached?another?way.200???? ?????? The?fact?that?on?some?occasions?screws?were?inserted?into?the?front?at?a?later?date?points?to? a?common?problem?created?by?Riesener?s?technique.??On?many?of?Riesener?s?pieces?there? are?visible?signs?that?pieces?of?veneer?on?the?inside?have?been?replaced,?where?the?veneer? has?been?cut?out?in?order?to?access?a?bolt?holding?the?ormolu?which?has?had?to?be?removed? in?order?to?either?clean?or?repair?the?ormolu?or?simply?remove?the?ormolu?to?repair?or?clean? the?surface?of?the?wood.??Removing?ormolu?cannot?be?accomplished?without?risking? damage.??? ? One?might?think?that?Chippendale?might?have?developed?similar?techniques?to?hide?the? screw?from?view?but?this?was?not?the?case.?In?fact?Chippendale?used?screws?and?pins? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 200?A?review?of?the?files?at?The?Wallace?Collection?did?not?indicate?that?anyone?had?ever?looked?at?this?issue?or? they?had?simply?not?documented?any?observations?concerning?this.??? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 303? Figure?5?69:?The?inside?of?the?top?drawer?of?the?Riesener?secr?taire? ??abattant?(F302?at?The?Wallace?Collection)?notice?the?round?bolts? that?are?used?to?hold?the?ormolu?to?the?face?of?the?drawer.?This?is? often?seen?on?Riesener?pieces?of?furniture.?? ? inserted?through?holes?drilled?through?the?ormolu?on?the?Harewood?desk.??However,?great? care?was?taken?to?trying?to?hide? the?pins?and?screws?by?setting? them?among?design?elements? that?would?help?conceal?them.?? ? Quality?of?the?Ormolu?? There?follows?below?a?series?of? photographs?which?show?a?close? up?of?a?couple?of?sections?of? ormolu?found?the?two?case? study?items.??Several?conclusions? are?immediately?evident.??The? Riesener?ormolu?is?of?a?better? quality?of?carving,?moulding?and?chasing?than?the?Chippendale?ormolu.??The?colour?of?the? metals?also?appears?different?too???though?further?testing?would?be?needed?to?confirm?the? specific?formulas?of?the?metals?used.?The?conclusion?that?the?Riesener?piece?appears?to?have? the?better?quality?of?ormolu?is?not?surprising?for?two?reasons:??? ? ? Riesener?s?expertise?was?reflected?in?his?greater?use?of?ormolu;?its?use?was?quite?rare? for?Chippendale.??? ? In?general,?French?furniture?was?also?more?likely?to?have?ormolu?than?English? furniture;?suggesting?that?the?industry?for?its?production?was?a?great?deal?more? developed?in?France?than?England.? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 304? Pin? ? ? ? Screw? Screw? Screw? Pin? Pin? Figure?5?70:?These?picture?show?examples?of?the? various?locations?where?Chippendale?s?workshop? used?screws?and?pins?to?hold?the?ormolu?in?place.?? While?this?is?probably?not?the?most?favourable? approach?to?attaching?ormolu?from?an?aesthetic? point?of?view,?Chippendale?s?staff?went?to?great? effort?to?disguise?the?locations?of?the?screws?and? pins?as?evidenced?in?these?pictures.?? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 305?? ? Figure?5?71:??These?details?of?the? ormolu?on?the?Chippendale? Harewood?Library?Table?(top)?and? Riesener?s?F302?(bottom)? demonstrates?the?higher?quality? of?the?chasing?on?the?Riesener? piece.??Notice?the?brighter? highlights?and?the?smoother? finish?on?the?highlighted?sections.?? One?example?is?the?forehead?on? the?ram?s?head,?which?shows? obvious?bumps?and? imperfections.??A?close?inspection? of?the?small?beads?also?shows? that?the?Riesener?ormolu?is?better? shaped,?more?distinct?and?more? consistent?in?their?shine.??Again,? this?suggests?an?improved? finishing.???Greater?detail?is?also? evident?on?other?sections?of? ormolu.??? ? While?this?next?suggestion?could? be?due?in?part?to?photographic? imperfections,?or?differences?in? the?relative?conditions?of?the? metals,?the?colour?of?the? Harewood?Library?Table?s?ormolu? is?slightly?greener?than?that?of?the? Riesener?pieces?indicating?a? possible?difference?in?the?metals? used?to?base?or?to?coat?the? ormolu?on?these?two?pieces.? Further?testing?would?be?needed? to?confirm?what?the?differences? are.?(Note?all?but?one?picture? were?taken?by?the?author,?the? lower?left?picture?was?taken?from? P.?Hughes,?The?Wallace?Collection? Catalogue?of?Furniture,?Vol?II.?p.? 999).?? ? ? ? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 306? ? It?should?be?noted?that?while?the?general?perception?and?the?usual?description?of?ormolu? mounts?from?this?period?is?that?it?is?mercury?gilded?bronze?(Copper?plus?tin).??However? testing?has?been?accomplished?on?two?of?the?secr?taire???abattants?by?Riesener?that?were? discussed?in?this?thesis?as?well?as?several?other?French?pieces?that?were?made?during?this? period.???The?findings?indicate?that?the?better?description?of?the?base?metal?would?be?brass? (Copper?plus?zinc).??However,?even?in?this?description?the?ratio?of?copper?to?zinc?is?quite? variable?with?the?percentage?of?zinc?ranging?from?25%?(for?the?Riesener?secr?taire??? abattant????F303)?to?the?low?of?14%?for?a?commode?made?approximately?30?years?prior.??The? measurements?for?the?Riesener?pieces?varied?quite?significantly?with?the?percentage?of? copper?ranging?from?68%?to?78%?and?of?zinc?it?was?16%?25%?(the?other?materials?measured? were?quite?consistent).??While?there?was?one?English?piece?made?during?this?time?that?was? included?in?the?testing?it?had?slightly?smaller?proportion?of?copper?(78%)?and?zinc?(19%)?and? virtually?no?tin?(<1%).???? ? The?following?table?(Table?5?13)?details?the?findings.??In?this?table?there?are?four?pieces?that? were?by?Riesener;?two?secr?taire???abattants?and?two?commodes.??It?should?be?pointed?out? that?three?(the?two?commodes?and?F303)?make?use?of?the?later?detailed?floral?designed? ormolu.??That?does?not?appear?to?be?a?factor?in?different?metal?formulations.?? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 307? ? Table?5?13? XRF?ANALYSIS?OF?ORMOLU?ON?WALLACE?COLLECTION?FURNITURE201? Element?(Est?%?of?Total?by?volumn)?? Description? (Ref? No./maker) 202? ? Date? Made? Copper? (Cu)? Zinc? (Zn)? Tin? (Sn)? Lead? (Pb)? Iron? (Fe)? ? Other? ? Total? 69%? 21%? 2%? 0%? 2%? 6%? 100%?Secr?taire??? abattant??(F300? Riesener)? 1780? 74? 21? 1? 1? 1? 2? 100? 71? 24? 1? <1? 1? 2? 100?Secr?taire??? abattant??(F303? ??Riesener)? 1783? 68? 25? 1? 1? 1? 4? 100? 74? 19? 2? 1? 2? 2? 100?Chest?of? Drawers?(F86??? Gaudreaus) 203? 1739? 77? 20? 1? 1? 1? <1? 100? 76? 18? 1? 1? 1? 3? 100?Commode?(F70? ??Marchand)204? 1755? 81? 14? <1? 2? <1? 3? 100? 70? 24? 1? 2? 1? 2? 100?Chest?of? Drawers?(F246??? Leleu205)? 1772? 77? 19? <1? 3? <1? <1? 100? 71? 16? 2? 4? 2? 5? 100?Chest?of? Drawers?(F247?? Riesener)?? 1780? 74? 24? <1? 1? <1? <1? 100? 76? 17? 1? 0? 4? 2? 100?Corner? Cabinet?(F275? Riesener)?? 1780? 78? 18? 1? 2? 1? <1? 100? ? The?other?elements?that?were?uncovered?using?the?XRF?methodology?include?Nickel?(Ni),? and?Antimony?(Sb).??In?all?cases,?these?registered?at?less?that?1%.?? ? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 201?While?other?materials?were?detected?the?key?ingredients?of?interest?in?determining?if?the?base?metal?of?the? ormolu?was?brass?or?bronze?are?the?three?detailed?here.??The?tests?were?conducted?twice?and?both?sets?of? findings?are?shown?here.??Note?also?that?all?of?these?pieces?of?furniture?were?French.? 202?All?pieces?tested?were?from?The?Wallace?Collection;?the?numbers?presented?are?those?catalogue?numbers? that?can?be?located?in?any?version?of?their?catalogue?whether?it?is?the?P.?Hughes?or?the?F.?Watson?versions.??? 203?The?use?of?the?term??chest?of?drawers??is?the?term?used?in?the?report.??The?furniture?maker?of?this?piece?is? Antoine?Gaudreaus?(1682?1746).?? 204?The?cabinetmaker?s?name?is?Nicolas?Jean?Marchand?(1697???1755)? 205?The?cabinetmaker?s?name?is?Jean?Francois?Leleu?(1729?1807)? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 308? An?interesting?study?would?be?to?track?the?changes?in?Riesener?s?work?across?his?career?to? see?if?his?ormolu?used?consistent?formulas?across?this?time.??It?is?suspected?that?that?there? would?have?been?a?difference?in?the?formulas.? ? It?should?be?pointed?out?that?similar?analysis?has?not?been?conducted?for?the?Chippendale? piece?of?furniture.?This?was?due?to?the?lack?of?funding?for?this?additional?analysis.??The? analysis?for?The?Wallace?Collection?had?been?conducted?by?The?Wallace?staff?and?did?not? require?additional?funding.?? ? The?Internal?Structure?for?Inserting?Drawers:??Again,?there?were?some?very?interesting? comparisons?between?Chippendale?and?Riesener?in?the?approach?to?making?the?slots?or? cavities?for?holding?drawers.??Both?approaches?were?effective?and?reflective?of?the?high? quality?that?was?practiced?in?each?of?the?workshops?but?they?were?different.? ? For?example,?there?was?very? rarely?a?case?with?Chippendale?s? work?that?did?not?stop?the? drawers?with?two?small? (approximately?3?4?mm?thick)? hexagonal?piece?of?oak.??In?one? exception?on?the?Harewood? desk,?Chippendale?used?an? overhanging?lip?and?hexagonal? pieces?of?oak?to?stop?the?drawer? from?going?in?too?far???see?Figure? 5?73.??The?use?of?these? hexagonal?pieces?allowed?for?slight?inaccuracies?or?error.?? ? Riesener?on?the?other?hand?used?the?length?of?the?drawer?to?define?how?far?the?drawer? went?into?its?slot.??The?result?is?that?the?Riesener?pieces?were?entirely?dependent?on?the?skill? of?his?cabinetmakers?to?ensure?a?good?fit.??In?only?one?case???the?F300?at?the?Wallace???was?a? ? ? Figure?5?72:??Cavity?for?two?drawers?of?F302?showing?how? rosewood?was?used?as?a?type?of?guide?for?the?small?drawers?that? was?to?be?inserted.? ? ? MAKING?FASHIONABLE?FURNITURE:?Chapter?V???Case?Histories? Page?? ? 309? mistake?noticed?on?a?Riesener?secr?taire???abattant,?where?a?small?strip?of?wood?had?been? attached?to?the?end?of?the?drawer?to?correct?an?error?in?its?measurement.206??? ? Riesener?also?used?thin?strips?(approximately?3?4?mm?thick)?strips?of?rosewood?(palissandre)? as?drawer?guides?and?it?was?reasoned?above?that?this?was?not?a?mistake.??There?are?several? possible?reasons?for?this?selection.??First?it?frequently?matched?the?edges?of?the?drawers? (even?though?most?people?never?saw?this?piece)?the?second?reason?is?that?it?is?a?very?hard? and?a?very?durable?wood?which?would?make?it?good?for?this?purpose.?Thirdly,?it?was?a?very? oily?wood?which?would?aid?in?the?working?of?the?drawer.?Chippendale?used?oak?as?the? runner?for?the?drawers?of?all?the?library?tables?examined?for?this?thesis.?? ? Internal?Construction?of?the?Secr?taire:??Chippendale?and?Riesener?approached?the?design? of?the?internal?sections?of?the?Secr?taire?differently,?though?Chippendale?made?only?two? secr?taire???abattant?as?far?as?we?know???one?finished?in?marquetry?and?the?other? Japanned.207?Most?of?the?pictures?that?follow?are?of?Chippendale?s?Japanned?secr?taire?and?? ? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 206?Because?the?colouration?of?the?added?strip?of?wood?it?appears?to?be?the?same?age?as?the?wood?used?in?the? body?of?the?drawer?it?appears?that?the?piece?was?added?by?men?in?Riesener?s?workshop.??? 207?The?only?notable?difference?between?the?two?are?the?materials?used?for?the?outside?covering,?while?one? used?a?marquetry?veneered?technique,?which?was?typical?of?many?of?Chippendales?later?pieces,?the?other?used? special?Japanned?panels?that?had?been?purchased?by?Edwin?Lascelles?and?given?to?Chippendale?to?produce?this? and?a?couple?of?other?pieces?of?furniture.????Because,?structurally?they?appear?to?be?the?same,?and?they?were? built?around?the?same?time?as?each?other?it?is?assumed?that?they?actually?are?the?same?structurally.? ? ? Figure?5?73:??Different?ways?Chippendale?stopped?the?drawers?on?the?Harewood?Library?Table.??The? left?picture?shows?the?use?of?hexagonal?drawer?stops?and?the?picture?on?the?right?demonstrates?the? use?of?the?overhang?to?stop?the?drawer.??In?each?of?these?cases?both?the?overhang?and?the?drawer? stops?were?used.??The?drawer?stops?were?the?most?frequently?used?approach?by?Chippendale.?